Frequently Asked Questions
“Isn’t medium pressure UV and Hydrogen Peroxide really the best AOP process?”
The combination of medium pressure UV and Hydrogen Peroxide is a well known AOP process, but it is not the only one. Combinations of low pressure UV, Hydrogen Peroxide and/or Ozone in many cases offer advantages in terms of operating costs, power consumption, removal efficiency or footprint. ITT is able to offer both core technologies – UV and Ozone.
“Can Bromate be formed in the use of ozone AOP applications?“
Generally, the formation of Bromate is only possible if relevant quantities of Bromide are present in the water. If Bromide is present, the innovative combination of Ozone with Hydrogen Peroxide allows a significant reduction of the direct reaction of Ozone with Bromide, often resulting in minimal Bromate formation.
“How can a combination of O3, H2O2 and UV be less expensive than UV / H2O2?”
Different water contaminants should be treated with the most appropriate technology, tailored for the specific contaminant removal. The MiPROTM eco3 plus solution allows each single step to be optimally designed, resulting in lower total treatment cost.
“Why does low pressure UV irradiation work especially well with AOP?”
In many cases, photosensitive substances like NDMA or Amidotrizoic Acid are directly degraded very efficiently with UV light (254 nm). By photolysis, the UV light breaks down the chemical compounds and, thus, the degradation of the pollutants. In addition, the activation of Hydrogen Peroxide leads to effective oxidation of micropollutants.
WEDECO MiPRO™

An Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) triggers the formation of OH radicals in the treated water. This process eliminates a wide variety of toxic compounds and dangerous micropollutants. ITT's Advanced Oxidation Processes - the MiPRO™ solutions - are based on three key components: Ozone, Hydrogen Peroxide, and UV light. By combining these technologies, the best solution for specific contaminants can be provided.
Our philosophy is to design each WEDECO MiPRO™ solution as the perfect complement to the existing process. The overall goal: ensured removal performance with the highest efficiency possible. The choice of the treatment technologies always depends on the target contaminant, considering on-site conditions such as footprint, flow rate and energy costs. ITT will supply the WEDECO MiPRO™ concept in three configurations:
MiPRO™ eco3 | MiPRO™ photo | MiPRO™ eco3 plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
Components |
|
|
|
Application |
|
|
|
Advantages |
|
|
|
This diagram compares the costs (per 1,000 gal of water treated) of various AOP scenarios based on power consumption, ozone dose, and H2O2 dose. The treatment goal of this case is the reduction of pesticides and pharmaceuticals at a water flow of 12 MGD. The costs include capital costs, footprint, oxygen, energy, H2O2 and maintenance.
Click on picture to enlarge.
Your solution: the Best Available Technology
Ideally, contaminated water should always be treated using the most efficient of the various processes. That's why the implementation of an Advanced Oxidation Process in a water or wastewater facility should always begin with the correct treatment process selection.
Application | Contaminants | O3 | UV | O3 | UV | O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
++ = Removal of 81 - 100% | ||||||
Industrial Chemicals | 1,4-Dioxane | 0 | 0 | ++ | + | ++ |
MTBE | 0 | 0 | ++ | 0 | ++ | |
NDMA | 0 | + | + | ++ | ++ | |
Pesticides | Atrazine | + | 0 | ++ | + | ++ |
Bromacil | ++ | 0 | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
Pharmaceuticals | Diclofenac | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Carbamazepine | ++ | 0 | ++ | + | ++ | |
Ibuprofen | + | 0 | ++ | + | ++ | |
Amidotrizoic Acid | + | + | + | ++ | ++ | |
Iohexol | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
Hormones | ++ | 0 | ++ | + | ++ | |
Taste & Odor | Geosmin | ++ | 0 | ++ | + | ++ |
MIB | ++ | 0 | ++ | + | ++ | |
Decolorization | ++ | 0 | ++ | 0 | ++ | |
TOC Removal | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | |
Disinfection | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | |
Get to know more about...

